It
was an easy question and you should search for these sorts of questions because the UPSC level of questions is increasing and you can not leave them.
With
reference to
anti-defection law in India, consider the following statements:- UPSC pre 2022
1.
The law specifies that a nominated legislator
cannot join any political party within six months of being appointed to the
House.
2. The
law does not provide any time frame within which the presiding officer has to
decide a defection case.
Which
of the statements given above is/are correct ?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Solution - B
Why Question asked?
Anti-defection
laws are frequently in the news.
Recently,
the Calcutta High Court has given West Bengal Assembly Speaker a deadline to
pass an order in the defection case.
Everything you need to know about
Anti-defection for UPSC
Origin [Story]
Rajiv Gandhi's government proposed a new anti-defection
bill in Parliament.
After marathon debates, both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha unanimously approved the bill and through
52nd CAA, 1985
The tenth Schedule was inserted into the constitution.
It
contains provisions Wrt the disqualification of members
of Parliament
and
the state legislatures on the ground of defection:
What are the objectives of the 91st Amendment Act, of 2003?
Objective
1. To limit the size of the Council of Ministers, |
Not exceed 15% of the total strength of the Lok Sabha [all ministers including PM] |
For SCM - 15% rule + min. 12 |
2.To debar defectors from holding public
offices, |
disqualified on the ground of defection shall also be disqualified to hold any remunerative political post. [धोखेबाज को सजा मिलेगी] |
What
does Remunerative post means? |
[कोई
भी सरकारी post नहीं
] |
|
Any office
--- Salary from public revenue |
3.To strengthen the anti-defection law |
split
by one-third members--- Exception removed |
for more details on 91st CAA, 2003watch this
Let's
revise the concept using the question….
Comments
Post a Comment