The question on contempt of court was an easy question because it is part of most of the standard
books and it remains in news on regular basis.
Consider
the following statements :
1. Pursuant to the report of H.N. Sanyal Committee, the Contempt of Courts Act,
1971 was passed.
2.
The Constitution of India empowers the Supreme
Court and the High Courts to punish for contempt of themselves.
3.
The Constitution of India defines Civil Contempt
and Criminal Contempt.
4. In India, the Parliament is vested with the
power to make laws on Contempt of Court.
Which
of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 1, 2 and 4
(c) 3 and 4 only
(d) 3 only
Solution
- B
Why Question asked - Recently, the Supreme Court
held that its power to punish contempt
under
Article 129 is a constitutional power, which cannot be done away with even by
any law.
Analysis of each statement
1. Pursuant to the report of H.N. Sanyal Committee, the Contempt of Courts
Act, 1971 was passed.
What is Pursuant?
Pursuant
means in accordance with (a law or a legal document or resolution).
Story of HN sanyal Committee
A
committee was set up in 1961 under the chairmanship of the late H N Sanyal, the
then
additional
solicitor general.
Why Contempt of Court is
Controversial?
Article
19 Gives us Freedom of speech and expression and
there is a need for
safeguarding
the status and dignity of courts and the interests
of the administration of justice.
Statement
2. The Constitution of India empowers the
Supreme Court and the High Courts to punish for contempt of themselves.
Article 129 of the Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to initiate contempt
cases on its own, independent of the motion brought before it by the Attorney
General (AG)
or
with the consent of the AG.
Article 215-
Contempt of court related power to High court.
Section 10 of The Contempt of Courts Act of 1971
defines the power of the High Court to punish contempt of its subordinate courts.
Note - Subordinate Courts have no jurisdiction to exercise the power under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, except to refer the matter to the High Court.
The
Constitution also includes contempt of court as a
reasonable restriction
to the freedom of speech and expression U/A 19, along with
elements like public order and defamation.
3.
The Constitution of India defines Civil Contempt
and Criminal Contempt.
The Contempt of Courts Act,
1971 defines
both civil and criminal contempt.
Civil contempt |
Criminal contempt |
refers
to wilful disobedience to any judgment of the
court. Ex,- Manoj Tiwari, 2018 case - Later he
apologized for it |
can be invoked if an act: 1. Tends to scandalise
or lower the authority of the court. 2.Tends to interfere with
the due course of any judicial proceeding. 3.Obstruct the
administration of justice.[Even Phone ringing in court room] Ex. Prashant Bhusan 2020 case |
The issue with the The
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
Section 5
Of the act provides that fair criticism or fair comment
On
the merits of Finally decide case would not amount to contempt
However
, Determination of what is fair is left to interpretation of Judges.
This
open-ended interpretation sometime compomise FOSE U/A 19.
4. In India, the
Parliament is vested with the powers to make laws on Contempt of Court.
It
is obvious because that is why THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971
Let'e Revise the concept using Question
Comments
Post a Comment